пятница, 10 апреля 2015 г.

PHL 320 Week 2 Quiz

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-2-quiz

1. Uncertainty exists when the manager A. knows that the probability of success is less than 100 percent B. knows the risk involved in making the decision C. faces two conflicting issues D. has insufficient information to make the decision
2. Which of the following statements about group decision making improves the chances that the decision will be implemented successfully? A. People who participate in a group discussion are more likely to understand why the decision was made. B. Different approaches to solving the problem are available. C. More information is available when several people are making the decision. D. A single group member can dominate the discussion
3. A phenomenon that occurs in decision making when group members avoid disagreement as they strive for consensus is known as A. goal displacement B. satisficing C. groupthink D. domination
4. Identify the fallacy in the following statement: “Frankly, I don’t think you would be satisfied with anything less than our Model 24, which allows for more expansion than any other personal computer in its class. The way you catch on to things—something I can tell just from the questions you’ve asked here in the store—you’re not going to be happy with a machine whose limits you’ll soon reach.” A. Apple polishing B. Wishful thinking C. Groupthink D. Scare tactics
5. Identify the rhetorical device that appears in the following passage: “Once you’ve made our day planner a part of your business life, there’s a good chance you’ll never miss or be late for another appointment.” A. Downplayer B. Innuendo C. Rocker D. Weaseler
6. Identify the rhetorical device that appears in the following passage: “The conservative mind is rigid and inflexible, like an orange peel that’s dried out in the sun.” A. Slander B. Stereotype C. Loaded question D. Innuendo
7. To maximize a decision is to A. use groupthink for individual decisions B. involve as many people affected by the decision as possible in its design C. achieve the best possible outcome D. generate many alternatives for evaluation
8. Psychological bias in decision making is best described as A. the inability to be objective when gathering, evaluating, and applying information for decision making B. the conflict that results from too many people involved with making a decision C. the effect that people's psychological capabilities have on the decisions they must make under pressure D. the fact that people are motivated by a need for power that clouds their decision-making capabilities
9. The four traditional management functions, still relevant today, include A. planning, leading, controlling, and organizing B. marketing, finance, accounting, and production C. planning, operations, labor, and contracting D. hiring, training, appraising, and firing

PHL 320 Week 1 Quiz

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-1-quiz

1. The bandwagon effect is a common bias, which refers to
A. the tendency to one’s thinking with the underdog
B. the tendency to one’s thinking with a negative advertisement
C. the tendency to one’s thinking with cognitive dissonance
D. an unconscious tendency to one’s thinking with that of other people
2. Some cognitive biases involve heuristics, which are
A. general rules we unconsciously follow in estimating probabilities.
B. the probability of an event happening based on personal experience
C. the probability of an event happening based on family experience
D. the probabilities of an event happening based on science
3. The in-group bias is characterized by
A. a rational evaluation of those in other groups
B. conclusions supported by data
C. accepting individuals from other teams and groups
D. believing that the achievements of the members of my group are a result of hard work
4. The premise of a good deductive argument, if true
A. does not prove or demonstrate its conclusion
B. proves or demonstrates its conclusion
C. supports the conclusion
D. does not support the conclusion
5. If we know that an argument is weak, then we know that the conclusion
A. is false
B. is true
C. may or may not be true
6. “The ensemble played an encore at last year’s concert, and I’m pretty sure they played one the year before as well. So they will most likely play an encore at this year’s concert.” This argument is best taken as
A. inductive
B. deductive
C. simplistic
D. argumentative
7. Critical thinking involves
A. blindly acting or reacting
B. making wise decisions and coming to correct conclusions
C. basing decisions on emotion or greed
D. basing decisions on intuition or a gut feeling
8. In decision making, critical thinking will help increase the validity of your decisions by
A. incorporating logical flaws
B. ignoring viewpoints that are contrary to your own
C. basing the decision on your opinions and the opinions of celebrities
D. determining what information is or is not pertinent
9. Arguments whose premises are intended to provide absolutely conclusive reasons for accepting the conclusion are deductive.
A. inductive
B. deductive
C. premise
D. opinions

PHL 320 Week 4 Individual Assignment SWOT and Strategy Evaluation Paper

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-4-individual-assignment-swot-and-strategy-evaluation-paper

Select an industry, such as the gambling industry, to complete a SWOT analysis.
Access the profile overview for the selected industry:
  • In the University Library, click Company Directory and Financials.
  • Click Hoover’s First Research.
  • Click Continue.
  • Click Submit.
  • Type gambling (or your selected industry) in the search box, and click to continue.
  • Gambling (or the selected industry of choice) should be first in the list.
Read the industry profile overview, including the website links, on the page.
Complete a SWOT analysis for the selected industry. The SWOT analysis allows a business to understand how a competitor is positioned in the environment by assessing its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. An understanding of a competitor’s position can be a key for a business to determine where funding and resources should be allotted to create new products or services.
Use information in the industry profile overview and other scholarly sources as needed. The SWOT analysis should include each of the following:
  • Strengths
  • Weaknesses
  • Opportunities
  • Threats
Write a 1,050- to 1,500-word paper, including the following attributes:
SWOT analysis, including a SWOT chart
Identify opportunities (either product or service) that could improve the customer experience.
Strategy evaluation
Define strategic tasks.
Assess the industry's capabilities.
Identify the barriers to strategy implementation.
A response to the following:
Based on the SWOT analysis and strategy evaluation, what are some creative actions the industry can pursue to include innovation as a component of their strategy?
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

PHL 320 Week 2 Individual Assignment Globalization Argumentative Paper

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-2-individual-assignment-globalization-argumentative-paper

Review the Writing Argumentative Essays section in Ch. 3 of Critical Thinking
Write an argumentative paper of no more than 750 words that demonstrates why globalization is good or not good for a business. The paper should define the term good, and should identify the premises and conclusions.
Identify the premise and conclusion by placing a number in bold at the beginning of the sentence with the word premise or conclusion. For example: (1, Premise), (2, Premise), (1, Conclusion), (2, Conclusion), and so on.
  • Sentences labeled as “1, premise” are premises for the sentence labeled as “1, conclusion.”
  • All premises should be labeled for each conclusion in the article. If a sentence is a conclusion and a premise for another conclusion, place two labels.
  • At the end of the paper, identify one example of how you used deductive reasoning and one example of how you used inductive reasoning.

PHL 320 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Re-organization and Layoff Team Discussion & Summary

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-2-learning-team-assignment-re-organization-and-layoff-team-discussion-summary

Re-organization and Layoff Team Discussion & Summary
Review the linked articles and select one to review with your team.
Post your response to the following questions for your selected article:
What is the problem presented in the article?
Why do you think it is the problem?
What are some possible solutions?
Discuss with your team, responding to your teammates' posts.
Write a 3-paragraph synopsis that summarizes your team's discussion

PHL 320 Week 5 Individual Assignment Labor Practices Paper

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-5-individual-assignment-labor-practices-paper

A clothing company uses sweatshop labor to manufacture clothing products that contribute to low pricing, which is a consumer want.
Many companies have engaged in sweatshop labor. Did the clothing company engage in unethical labor practices by utilizing sweatshop labor?
Research sweatshop labor.
Write a paper of no more than 750 words to present your position on sweatshop labor and provide justification. Include the following:
  • How consumer demands affect a company’s business decision
  • How different ethical perspectives guide ethical decision making
  • How a company influences their ethical environment

PHL 320 Week 1 Individual Assignment Critical Analysis Worksheet

Download here:
http://newstudentoffortune.com/products/phl-320-week-1-individual-assignment-critical-analysis-worksheet

Critical Analysis Worksheet
Read “Common Core” and “The Battle Against Common Core Standards.”
Perform a critical analysis of each reading using critical thinking techniques from this week’s readings.
Respond to the following based on your critical thinking analysis of the “Common Core” and “The Battle Against Common Core Standards” readings.
Define the term conclusion.
What is the conclusion of each article?
Define the term premises.
What premises support the conclusions in each article?
How convincing is the conclusion of each article? Explain your answer.
Define the term biases.
What biases did you observe in each article? Why do you think they are biases?
What might be the sources of the biases in each article?